Values of hemodynamic changes of fetal vessels evaluated by color Doppler ultrasound for fetuses with growth restriction.

Valores de los cambios hemodinámicos de los vasos fetales evaluados mediante ecografía Doppler a color en fetos con restricción del crecimiento.

Keywords: color, Doppler ultrasound, fetal growth, growth restriction, restriction

Abstract

We aimed to explore the values of hemodynamic changes of fetal vessels evaluated by color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) for fetal growth restriction (FGR). A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data of 75 pregnant women who received prenatal examination from January 2021 to August 2023 and whose fetuses were diagnosed with FGR (FGR group) and 75 pregnant women whose fetuses were healthy in the same period and were considered as the healthy group. CDUS was performed on the fetuses. The values of indicators of umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery and aortic arch isthmus for assessing pregnancy outcomes were investigated. The FGR group had significantly lowered arterial resistance index (RI), blood flow pulsatility index (PI), and systolic and diastolic velocity (S/D) levels of the middle cerebral artery and peak systolic velocity (PSV)/end-systolic reflux velocity (ESRV) level of aortic arch isthmus but significantly elevated RI, PI, and S/D levels of umbilical artery in comparison with those of the healthy group (p<0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of RI, PI, and S/D of the umbilical artery in diagnosing FGR were 0.893, 0.893 and 0.900, respectively, AUCs of RI, PI, and S/D of the middle cerebral artery were 0.812, 0.874 and 0.910, respectively, and AUC of PSV/ESRV was 0.857 (p<0.05). The incidence rate of severe hypoxia was significantly higher in the fetuses with a more significant RI value of the middle cerebral artery and a larger PSV/ESRV value than those with a smaller RI value of the middle cerebral artery and a smaller PSV/ESRV value (p<0.05). The changes in umbilical artery RI, middle cerebral artery RI, and PSV/ESRV were unrelated to fetal survival rate (p>0.05). Fetal umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery and aortic arch isthmus parameters detected through CDUS are all sensitive indices for assessing FGR.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Damhuis SE, Ganzevoort W, Gordijn SJ. Abnormal fetal growth: small for gestational age, fetal growth restriction, large for gestational age: definitions and epidemiology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021; 48(2): 267-279. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ogc.2021.02.002

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 227: Fetal Growth Restriction: Correction. Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 137(4): 754. https://doi. org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004350

Feucht U, Mulol H, Vannevel V, Pattinson R. The ability of continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound to detect fetal growth restriction. PLoS One. 2021; 16(8): e0255960. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255960

MacDonald TM, Hui L, Robinson AJ, Dane KM, Middleton AL, Tong S, Walker SP. Cerebral-placental-uterine ratio as novel predictor of late fetal growth restriction: prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 54(3): 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20150

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 277: Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 137(2): 385-387. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004252

Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, da Silva Costa F, Ferrazzi E, Figueras F, Hecher K, Kingdom J, Poon LC, Salomon LJ, Unterscheider J. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56(2): 298-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22134

Muniz CS, Dias BF, Motoyama PVP, Almeida CTC, Feitosa FEL, Araujo Júnior E, Alves JAG. Doppler abnormalities and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with early-onset fetal growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35(25):7276-7279. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1946786

Beunders VAA, Roelants JA, Suurland J, Dudink J, Govaert P, Swarte RMC, Kouwenberg-Raets MMA, Reiss IKM, Joosten KFM, Vermeulen MJ. Early ultrasonic monitoring of brain growth and later neurodevelopmental outcome in very preterm infants. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022; 43(4): 639-644. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7456

Yin Q, Zhang Y, Ma Q, Gao L, Li P, Chen X. The clinical value of blood flow parameters of the umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery for assessing fetal distress. Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(5): 5280-5286. PMID: 34150119

Cahill LS, Stortz G, Ravi Chandran A, Milligan N, Shinar S, Whitehead CL, Hobson SR, Ayyathurai V, Rahman A, Saghian R, Jobst KJ, McShane C, Block-Abraham D, Seravalli V, Laurie M, Millard S, Delp C, Wolfson D, Baschat AA, Murphy KE, Serghides L, Morgen E, Macgowan CK, Parks WT, Kingdom JC, Sled JG. Wave reflections in the umbilical artery measured by Doppler ultrasound as a novel predictor of placental pathology. EBio-Medicine. 2021; 67: 103326. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103326

Oelmeier K, Möllers M, Köster HA, Willy D, Bormann E, Braun J, Klockenbusch W, Schmitz R. Fetal adrenal gland size and umbilical artery Doppler in growth estricted fetuses. J Perinat Med. 2022; 51(3): 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1515/ jpm-2022-0203

Bligard KH, Xu X, Raghuraman N, Dicke JM, Odibo AO, Frolova AI. Clinical significance of umbilical artery intermittent vs persistent absent end-diastolic velocity in growth restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 227(3): 519. e1-519.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ajog.2022.06.005

Steller JG, Driver C, Gumina D, Peek E, Harper T, Hobbins JC, Galan HL. Doppler velocimetry discordance between paired umbilical artery vessels and clinical implications in fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 227(2): 285.e1-285.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.029

Arslan HC, Corbacıoglu Esmer A, Akca A, Arslan K. The effect of middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity on prognosis in early and late-onset fetal growth restriction. J Perinat Med. 2022; 51(4): 559-563. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2022-0305

Yang Z, Lv W, Zhao B, Yao J, Yang Y, Yin Z. Uteroplacental-Cerebral Ratio: a Doppler parameter for pPrognostic prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction: Single Center Prospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2022; 12(1): 275. https://doi. org/10.3390/jcm12010275

Uyan Hendem D, Ocal FD, Oluklu D, Besimoglu B, Sinaci S, Atalay A, Menekse Beser D, Tanacan A, Sahin D. Evaluation of fetal middle adrenal artery Doppler and fetal adrenal gland size in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction: a case control study. J Perinat Med. 2022; 51(4): 492-499. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2022-0270

Krishnamurthy MB, Pharande P, Whiteley G, Hodges RJ, Malhotra A. Postnatal middle cerebral artery Dopplers in growth restricted neonates. Eur J Pediatr. 2020; 179(4): 571-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-019-03540-3

Vigneswaran TV, Bellsham-Revell HR, Chubb H, Simpson JM. Early postnatal echocardiography in neonates with a pre-natal suspicion of carctation of the aorta. Pediatr Cardiol. 2020; 41(4): 772-780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020- 02310-5

Contro E, Cattani L, Balducci A, Prandstraller D, Perolo A, Larcher L, Reggiani MLB, Farina A, Donti A, Gargiulo GD, Pilu G. Prediction of neonatal coarctation of the aorta at fetal echocardiography: a scoring system. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35(22): 4299-4305. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1849109

Abdelshafi S, Okasha A, Elsirgany S, Khalil A, El-Dessouky S, AbdelHakim N, Elanwary S, Elsheikhah A. Peak systolic velocity of fetal middle cerebral artery to predict anemia in Red Cell Alloimmunization in untransfused and transfused fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021; 258: 437-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.046
Published
2025-03-06
How to Cite
Chen, Y., & Zhong, D. (2025). Values of hemodynamic changes of fetal vessels evaluated by color Doppler ultrasound for fetuses with growth restriction.: Valores de los cambios hemodinámicos de los vasos fetales evaluados mediante ecografía Doppler a color en fetos con restricción del crecimiento. Investigación Clínica, 66(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.54817/IC.v66n1a02