Empresas híbridas y su impacto en la sociedad: revisión académica para su medición

Palabras clave: impacto social, empresas híbridas, medición cuantitativa

Resumen

El impacto social se define como el conjunto de cambios positivos en la vida de las personas asociados a problemas sociales, que son el efecto real de las intervenciones llevadas a cabo por la empresa. A pesar de la dificultad en su medición, las empresas híbridas lo consideran como un aspecto fundamental en la búsqueda por generar beneficios tanto sociales como económicos. La presente investigación tiene como objetivo realizar una revisión académica y clasificación de métodos cuantitativos relevantes para medir el impacto social generado por las empresas híbridas hacia su entorno. Se llevó a cabo a través de una revisión sistemática de la literatura en las bases de datos Scopus y Web of Science, complementada con un análisis de contenido web pertinente. Como resultado, se identificaron y clasificaron los 18 métodos más significativos de la actualidad. Se concluye que el impacto social es construido cognitivamente por cada actor individual, y a través de una negociación entre las partes interesadas, se llega a un acuerdo del significado dentro de su entorno. Por tanto, cada empresa puede conceptualizar la medición del impacto social de manera única, reflejando las particularidades y objetivos específicos de su actividad.

Biografía del autor/a

Mauricio José Martínez-Pérez

Magíster en ingeniería industrial de la Universidad Industrial de Santander (Colombia). Doctorando en Ciencias de la Administración en la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Par evaluador reconocido por Minciencias en Colombia. Docente de la Universidad Industrial de Santander. Email: mjmarper@correo.uis.edu.co ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7205-4970 Autor corresponsal. El autor agradece el apoyo al Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías, CONAHCYT por la beca nacional para su formación doctoral.

Maria Fernanda Castro Carrillo

Ingeniera Industrial de la Universidad Industrial de Santander (Colombia). Email: maria.castro5@correo.uis.edu.co ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8834-9351

Ximena Cruz Sierra

Ingeniera Industrial de la Universidad Industrial de Santander (Colombia). Email: ximena.cruz2@correo.uis.edu.co ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1448-754X

Iliana Rodriguez Santibañez

Doctora en Derecho de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (México). Maestra en Relaciones Internacionales de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Profesora - Investigadora del Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Campus Ciudad de México. Miembro del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores Nivel II del CONAHCYT. Email: ilrodrig@tec.mx ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8114-7797

Citas

Ahmadvand, M., & Karami, E. (2017). Social impacts evaluation and insider-outsider paradigm: Floodwater spreading project on the Gareh-Bygone plain as an illustrative case. Evaluation and Program Planning, 65, 69-76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.07.004

Akhmedova, A., Mas-Machuca, M., & Magomedova, N. (2022). Nexus between strategic fit and social mission accomplishment in social enterprises: Does organizational form matter? Journal Of Cleaner Production, 330, 129891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129891

Alter, K. (2007). Social enterprise typology. Virtue ventures LLC, 12(1), 1-124. https://isfcolombia.uniandes.edu.co/images/201519/LRD31.pdf

Arnold, L. M., Hanna, K., Noble, B., Gergel, S. E., & Nikolakis, W. (2022). Assessing the Cumulative Social Effects of Projects: Lessons from Canadian Hydroelectric Development. Environmental management, 69(5), 1035-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01622-x

Arvidson, M., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social Impact Measurement and Non-profit Organisations: Compliance, Resistance, and Promotion. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(4), 869-886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9373-6

Aschari-Lincoln, J., & Jacobs, C. (2018). Enabling Effective Social Impact: Towards a Model for Impact Scaling Agreements. Sustainability, 10(12), 4469. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124669

Agencia Valenciana de Innovación. (2018). Estudio sobre inversión de impacto. Un mecanismo de financiación basado en resultados para fomentar la innovación y el bienestar social. In. https://kveloce.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Report-AVI_Inversion-de-Impacto_Documento-Resumen-divulgativo_final-copia.pdf

Bacq, S., & Eddleston, K. A. (2018). A Resource-Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: How Stewardship Culture Benefits Scale of Social Impact. Journal of business ethics, 152(3), 589-611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3317-1

Bagnoli, L., & Megali, C. (2011). Measuring Performance in Social Enterprises. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009351111

Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419-1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318391

Bauwens, T., Huybrechts, B., & Dufays, F. (2020). Understanding the Diverse Scaling Strategies of Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Renewable Energy Cooperatives. Organization & Environment, 33(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619837126

Bhatt, A. (2018). Why Worry About Your Impact? Rationale, Challenges and Support for Indian Social Enterprises’ Impact Measurement. In A. Agrawal & P. Kumar (Eds.), Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Business Models: The Case of India (pp. 99-116). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74488-9_4

Blakley, J., & Russell, J. (2022). International progress in cumulative effects assessment: a review of academic literature 2008–2018. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65(2), 186–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1882408

Bocken, N. M. P., Fil, A., & Prabhu, J. (2016). Scaling up social businesses in developing markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.045

Bolzan, L. M., Bitencourt, C. C., & Martins, B. V. (2019). Exploring the scalability process of social innovation. Innovation & Management Review, 16(3), 218-234. https://doi.org/10.1108/inmr-05-2018-0029

Casado , J., Bernal, E., Mozas, A., Fernández , D., & Medina , M. (2017). Medición del impacto social y económico: políticas públicas de emprendimiento en Andalucía. CIRIEC-España, revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa, (90), 75-102. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.90.10181

Corvo, L., Pastore, L., Manti, A., & Iannaci, D. (2021). Mapping social impact assessment models: A literature overview for a future research agenda. Sustainability, 13(9), 4750. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094750

Cuellar-Galvez, D., Aranda-Camacho, Y., & Mosquera-Vasquez, T. (2018). A Model to Promote Sustainable Social Change Based on the Scaling up of a High-Impact Technical Innovation. Sustainability, 10(12), 4532. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124532

Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social Bricolage: Theorizing Social Value Creation in Social Enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 681-703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00370.x

Dufour, B. (2015). State of the art in social impact measurement: methods for work integration social enterprises measuring their impact in a public context 5th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise: “Building a scientific field to foster the social enterprise eco-system”, Helsinki, Finland. https://hal.science/hal-01458730

Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. (2014). What impact? Aframework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California Management Review, 3, 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.118

Folmer, E., Nederveen, C., & Schutjens, V. (2018). Network importance and use: commercial versus social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal, 14(4), 470-490. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-01-2018-0007

Grieco, C. (2015). Assessing social impact of social enterprises: Does one size really fit all? Springer.

Haigh, N., & Hoffman, A. (2014). The New Heretics: Hybrid Organizations and the Challenges They Present to Corporate Sustainability. Organization and Environment, 27(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614545345

Haigh, N., Walker, J., Bacq, S., & Kickul, J. (2015). Hybrid Organizations: Origins, Strategies, Impacts, and Implications. California Management Review, 57(3), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.5

Heuts, E., & Versele, A. (2016). RenoseeC: Renovating with a social, ecological and economic benefit through a collective approach. Procedia, (96), 450-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.097

Huybrechts, B., & Haugh, H. (2018). The roles of networks in institutionalizing new hybrid organizational forms: Insights from the European renewable energy cooperative network. Organization Studies, 39, 1085-1108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717097

Huybrechts, B., & Mertens, S. (2014). The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85(2), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12038

Islam, S. M. (2020). Towards an integrative definition of scaling social impact in social enterprises [Article]. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00164

Islam, S. M. (2021). Social impact scaling strategies in social enterprises: A systematic review and research agenda. Australian Journal of Management, 47(2), 298-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962211014931

Kah, S., & Akenroye, T. (2020). Evaluation of social impact measurement tools and techniques: a systematic review of the literature. Social Enterprise Journal, 16(4), 381-402. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-05-2020-0027

Kroeger, A., & Weber, C. (2014). Developing a Conceptual Framework for Comparing Social Value Creation. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 513-540. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0344

Kročil, O., & Pospíšil, R. (2018). Comprehensive measurement of social enterprise. Ekonomski Pregled, 69(5), 594–610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32910/ep.69.5.6

Lall, S. (2017). Measuring to Improve Versus Measuring to Prove: Understanding the Adoption of Social Performance Measurement Practices in Nascent Social Enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(6), 2633-2657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9898-1

Li, D., Chen, H., Man Hui, E. C., Yang, H., & Li, Q. (2014). A methodology for ex-post assessment of social impacts of an affordable housing project. Habitat International, 43, 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.01.009

Maas, K., & Liket, K. (2011). Social Impact Measurement: Classification of Methods. In R. Burritt, S. Schaltegger, M. Bennett, T. Pohjola, & M. Csutora (Eds.), Environmental Management Accounting and Supply Chain Management (pp. 171-202). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1390-1_8

Mitchell, A., & Lemon, M. (2019). Using the LM3 method to evaluate economic impacts of an on-line retailer of local food in an English market town. Local Economy, 34(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094219826569

Molecke, G., & Pinkse, J. (2017). Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises [Article]. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5), 550-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.05.003

Moore, M.-L., Riddell, D., & Vocisano, D. (2015). Scaling out, scaling up, scaling deep: Strategies of non-profits in advancing systemic social innovation. Journal of corporate citizenship, 58, 67–84. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jcorpciti.58.67

Morais-Da-Silva, R., Takahashi, A., & Segatto, A. (2016). Scaling up social innovation: a meta-synthesis. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6), 134-163. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p134-163

Mudaliar, A., Schiff, H., & Bass, R. (2016). Annual impact investor survey. In (6 ed.): GINN–Global Impact Investing Network.

Mulgan, G. (2010). Measuring Social Value. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(3), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.48558/NQT0-DD24

Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos- OCDE. (2015). Policy Brief on Social Impact Measurement for Social Enterprise. In.

Olsen, S., & Galimidi, B. (2008). Catalog of approaches to impact measurement: assessing social impact in private ventures. The Rockfeller Foundation.

Phillips, S. D., & Johnson, B. (2021). Inching to Impact: The Demand Side of Social Impact Investing. Journal of business ethics, 168(3), 615-629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04241-5

Pitt, H., & Jones, M. (2016). Scaling up and out as a pathway for food system transitions. Sustainability, 8, 1-18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101025

Ponte, D., Pesci, C., & Camussone, P. F. (2017). Between mission and revenue: measuring performance in a hybrid organization. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(2), 196-214. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-11-2015-1276

Rahdari, A., Sepasi, S., & Moradi, M. (2016). Achieving sustainability through Schumpeterian social entrepreneurship: The role of social enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.159

Rangan, V. K., & Gregg, T. (2019). How Social Entrepreneurs Zig-Zag Their Way to Impact at Scale. California management review, 62(1), 53-76, Article 0008125619876903. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619876903

Robin, S. (2012). Herramientas de medición del impacto social. Universidad Oberta de Cataluña.

Rodríguez, B. (2020). Medición de Impacto y evaluación de resultados. Red Innovasocial.

Rosenzweig, W. (2004). Double Bottom Line Project Report: Assessing Social Impact In Double Bottom Line Ventures. In: UC Berkeley: Center for Responsible Business.

Ruff, K., & Olsen, S. (2016). The Next Frontier in Social Impact Measurement Isn’t Measurement at All. https://doi.org/10.48558/18HV-0S18

Santander, M., Baque, O., & Litardo, M. (2016). Paradigma empresarial: organizaciones híbridas que combinan valores sociales y objetivos comerciales. Contribuciones a la Economía(2016-03). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11763/CE-3-objetivos

Santos, F., Pache, A., & Birkholz, C. (2015). Making Hybrids Work: Aligning Business Models and Organizational Design for Social Enterprises. California Management Review, 57(3), 36–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3

Slaper, T. F., & Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work. Indiana business review, 86(1), 4-8.

Stephan, U., Patterson, M., Kelly, C., & Mair, J. (2016). Organizations Driving Positive Social Change: A Review and an Integrative Framework of Change Processes [Review]. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1250-1281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316633268

Svynchuk, A. A., & Vadym Hetman Kyiv National Economic University. (2017). Methodical instrumentation of evaluation the results of social enterprise activity. SCIENTIFIC BULLETIN OF POLISSIA, 2(4(12)), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.25140/2410-9576-2017-2-4(12)-40-44

Tabares, S. (2021). Do hybrid organizations contribute to Sustainable Development Goals? Evidence from B Corps in Colombia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124615. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124615

Trujillo, R., Gómez, A., & Canales, R. (2018). Midiendo el Valor del Impacto Social Empresarial; Guía de Herramientas de Medición y Valoración del Impacto Social Empresarial. https://www.foretica.org/midiendo_el_valo_del_impacto_social_empresari al. pdf.

Tuan, M. T. (2008). Measuring and/or estimating social value creation: Insights into eight integrated cost approaches. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Seattle, WA.

Van Lunenburg , M., Geuijen, K., & Meijer, A. (2020). How and Why Do Social and Sustainable Initiatives Scale? A Systematic Review of the Literature on Social Entrepreneurship and Grassroots Innovation. Voluntas, 31(5), 1013–1024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00208-7

Vanclay, F., Esteves, A., Aucamp, I., & Franks, D. (2015). Social Impact Assessment: Guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. In: International Association for Impact Assessment.
Publicado
2024-07-15
Cómo citar
Martínez-Pérez, M. J., Castro Carrillo, M. F., Cruz Sierra, X., & Rodriguez Santibañez, I. (2024). Empresas híbridas y su impacto en la sociedad: revisión académica para su medición. Revista Venezolana De Gerencia, 29(11), 744-762. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.29.e11.44